Monday, 16 April 2012

Food Ratios

It is always interesting to think about the ratio of vegetable to meat intake and what is appropriate.  I find myself leaning toward thinking we should eat a higher percentage of plant matter.  However, in daily practice, end up eating a lot more meat.

Recently having exchanged a purple onion craving for a liver pate craving has been an interesting recent occurrence for me.

I still wonder why I was craving purple onion so much for several months.  I had read that the closer to a paleolithic regimen, the more organ meat cravings would set in.  So it is curious that I since I have become more strict, once again, that a liver craving has set in.  Is it the long-chain polyunsaturated fats (LCP) that my body is yearning for?

What is most interesting to me is that when adopting a vegetarian way of life (a lot of grain - wheat - and cheese), which may have been wrong but I see many vegetarians eating this way even now, and I was frequently ill.  When I brought meat back into my regimen, I felt better immediately with no apparent negative repercussions.

When my regimen reduces grain, dairy and refined sugar to none or almost none, I do not appear to become ill (viral) and when I increase that intake (during special occasions such as Christmas and Easter),  I don't feel any differently at first but gradually begin to decline.  The end result is a feeling of great fatigue, some minor joint pain and clearly being bloated (measurements prove this).  It is always a relief to get away from those 'treats' that end up, ultimately, replacing the amount of meat and plants in my regimen.

So why do I begin to feel so poorly even only 3 to 5 days into a grain/dairy (some refined sugar) increase?  Is it that I am replacing a higher fibre source (fibrous plants) and lower my LCP intake too far?  It is an interesting idea.

This is today's read that I am pondering:

 "...Chimpanzees are closest to humans genetically, sharing more than 98% of their DNA code with humans, and their digestive tract is functionally very similar to that of humans[citation needed]. Chimpanzees are primarily frugivores, but they could and would consume and digest animal flesh, given the opportunity. However, their actual diet in the wild is about 95% plant-based, with the remaining 5% filled with insects, eggs, and baby animals.[105][106] Some comparative studies of human and higher primate digestive tracts do suggest that humans have evolved to obtain greater amounts of calories from high-quality sources such as animal foods, allowing them to shrink the size of the gastrointestinal tract, relative to body mass, and to increase the brain mass instead.[91][107]

A difficulty with this point of view is that humans are established to require certain long-chain polyunsaturated fats (LCP), such as AA and DHA.[108] Human LCP requirements are much greater than chimpanzees' because of humans' larger brain mass, and humans' abilities to synthesize them from other nutrients are poor, suggesting readily available external sources.[109] Pregnant and lactating females require 100 mg of DHA per day.[110] But LCPs are nonexistent in plants, and DHA is also almost nonexistent in most tissues of warm-climate animals.

The source of DHA in the modern human diet is fish and fatty organs of animal like brains, eyes and viscera. Despite the general shortage of evidence for extensive fishing, thought to require relatively sophisticated tools which have become available only in the last 30–50 thousand years, it has been argued that exploitation of coastal fauna somehow provided hominids with abundant LCP.[109] Alternatively, it has been proposed that early hominids frequently scavenged predators' kills and consumed parts which were left untouched by predators, most commonly the brain, which is very high in AA and DHA.[110]

Just 100 g of scavenged African ruminant brain matter provide more DHA than is consumed by a typical modern U.S. adult in the course of a week.[110][111] Other authors suggested that human ability to convert alpha-Linolenic acid into DHA, while poor, is, nevertheless, adequate to prevent DHA deficiency in a plant-based diet.[112]..."


Friday, 6 April 2012

B Vitamins

B vitamins are, for many, the biggest favour a person can do for their body. Ten years ago, I couldn't believe the difference they made in my life.  That said, there are caveats at the beginning.  And many people worry about becoming 'addicted' to vitamins.

First of all, I believe it's always wise to be worried about becoming addicted to anything.  It makes a person careful, watchful and aware of themselves.  In my view, this is always a good thing.  That said, I have taken very high levels of vitamins (therapeutic doses) and now require them very seldom.

So here are some things I learned while researching to figure out what vitamins I wanted.

First of all, multivitamins are practically useless.  Putting the same stuff in your body day after day means that your body eventually doesn't even recognize it.  This is the addiction issue.  Also, most people resorting to 'suddenly' taking them, are people with health issues that include fairly severe vitamin deficiencies.  So giving a severely B deficient person a multi with only 10 mg of Bs, is kind of like giving someone dying of thirst one drop of water.  Think it'll save them?  Doubtful.

Should you get your doctor's advice before setting up an intensive protocol for yourself?  Of course.  At the time I did this though, I did not have a doctor to consult with, so I did a LOAD of research beforehand.  Now, I know more than the last doctor I spoke to could tell me and I'm happy to have this knowledge... but self-experimentation has risks and people should be very clear about that.

Case in point, don't take niacin at 100mg if you're not used to it. You'll get a niacin flush. It feels like you are internally combusting. I know, I've done it... a couple of times. The first time was on purpose to see if it would happen to me. (I don't trust a lot of literature and tend to 'test things out') lol The second time, I ate a piece of chicken at the same time. Good lesson though.

That said, I went back and cut those B100s in half and worked my way to a full B100 when I first 'cleaned up' my life.  I continued to take this level for years, slowly weaning myself off. The last few years, I only need a B50 occasionally.

It's worth taking a B50 for a while, to avoid 'flushing' then one and a half of those for a while, and then trying a B100 WITHOUT eating meat right before or right after. Take 2-3 weeks to work that in, then you're gold and should be fine with a B100.  To get 100mg of Bs from a multi, in some cases, you would have to take ten pills... which might put you over the top with some of the metals in the multis.  If you feel you must take a multi, which I have at times just supplemented my Bs on top of it.  So 10mg of Bs in the multi, I cut off a bit from a B100, ground up the rest and put it in the garden.  That way I felt it wasn't being wasted.

Also, never get timed release Bs. You can damage your liver over the long term. Those are really only for special scenarios that should be overseen by a doctor. You know I don't say that very often, so please, see a doctor before doing timed released Bs as they will need to evaluate you liver from time to time in such a case.

Most people who are short on Bs, are short on (everything of course) zinc. So I did 25mg every other day for two weeks, then took two weeks off. Now of course, I only take them for an occasional boost.

B12 must be taken with folic acid as too much of one will unbalance the other. This is especially important for women wanting to have more babies (spina bifida).

B12, methyl form, is immediately useful to the body. It is a sublingual and is absorbed by the tissue under the tongue. B12, cyano form, needs to be converted by the body before it is able to be used. If you lack the conversion enzyme, your body can't use it. That said, any people have had great success with both forms. Both B12 and folic acid are very helpful and important. I will repeat, even more important for women of child bearing years, to aid in the prevention of spina bifida.  Please supplement these BEFORE you even realize you want to have a baby, so that when you're ready, you're covered.

There's more to know about B vitamins and getting them naturally from your food. You can read about fermentation (LABs - Lactic Acid Bacteria) and sources of meat high in Bs. Not only is fermenting foods fast and easy, it makes for easy side dishes and snacks, provides healthy food instead of junk food. AND they can provide you with extra Bs you weren't getting, but maybe needed. LABs do not need be acquired via a dairy source.

hth K:)


Wednesday, 4 April 2012

Barefoot: Can Fallen Arches Be Rehabilitated?

Barefoot running is something I have recently become interested in.  I suppose it was only a matter of time since I lean toward 'old ways of living'. I prefer to call it "Earthy Living".

Nevertheless, over the years I have wondered, why do we all have fallen arches with all of the foot healthcare that goes into our daily lives?  Our feet are protected, coddled, padded, painted, massaged, etc.  Then it came to me... Are shoes like a corset?  Corsets historically left women with barely enough muscle to sit up on their own because the corset took over the job and the core muscles (stomach and back) became lax and eventually could no longer do the job of holding their person upright.  This very thing is referred to in the book, "The Corset - A Cultural History" by Valerie Steele,

"...weaken the back and abdominal muscles resulting in atrophy..."


Side Effects of Corsets

"...Abdominal muscle atrophy: Corsets worn extremely tight can cause the body to become dependent on them for support of the torso, allowing the abdominal muscles to waste away from lack of use..."

What if we have done the same to our feet?  What if the very things that were supposed to 'protect' our feet, have actually done damage to them and everything around them? (fallen arches, weak calves)  What if this is the source of so many leg problems today?

Steele's book goes on to state that if atrophy has not been extended too long or too far, it may be possible to rebuild muscle strength and integrity.  Might the same type of philosophy exist for fallen arches and weak calf muscles from walking in an unnatural heel-toe pattern?

It's a hopeful way of thinking. After all, witness the extremely out of shape humans who move on to look fabulous simply by virtue of working multiple muscle groups in their bodies.  And not only do they look fabulous, they are stronger and healthier than in their previously flabby state, even if that flabby state was 'thin'.

And so I decided to try strengthening my feet and all the connecting muscle groups around them by doing some barefoot exercises.  Some information I found on the internet were very helpful regarding retraining one's self to walk or run 'properly'.  I used some of the techniques and found them to have some seeming validity.

Everyone seems to agree that this is something that should be done gradually:

One site explained that a very quick way to learn the pattern of barefoot life is to begin by walking on gravel.  So I did that on the first day.  "Ouch".  I ended up with my arms in the air looking like I was trying to fly somewhere rather than walk.

That said, it certainly did illustrate the type of 'setting down' of the foot that one is more naturally inclined to do without the use of shoes.  It is more of a roll from the outer ball of the foot toward the inner ball of the foot while evenly spreading the weight over the upper 2/3 of the foot.

Here is a pretty good example on Youtube of how the foot should move.

Another site went on to explain that the calf muscles are extremely under-worked after years and years of heel-toe walking.  I found this to be true when I tried my first 2km run the next day on a track. (A track because it will take a good long time for me to be able to run on gravel I think)  The first interesting thing is that, though slower, I could run the whole 2km, and could have run farther very easily.  I do not yet know if this is because I was barefoot (socks only) or because I've reduced my grains to only once a week (popcorn on movie night).  However, either way, I did run the whole distance without stopping to walk at all.  My calves definitely started feeling taxed after the first time around the track.  It wasn't too hard to work through it but I did limit myself only to 2km to prevent over-stressing my gastrocnemius and my soleus (where I am definitely feeling some strain today).

There are two possible benefits from barefooting:  Earthing by Dr. Sinatra and correction of fallen arches (which is my goal).

According to,

"...Correcting Arch with Ankle Strength
The large gross movement muscles in the ankle can also help fix your arches. Standing calf raises work these muscles. They are done by placing your toes on the edge of a stair or raised surface with your heels hanging down and then lifting yourself up onto your toes. This will make your heels higher than your toes. This movement help to restore the arches of your feet and strengthen the entire foot and ankle complex as well...", 

This is exactly the type of motion one performs naturally when not wearing shoes.

And the Society for Barefoot Living has posted some very intriguing and inspiring study notes that have been published through the ages, of the possibility of correcting fallen arches.

And so I will continue with my experiment as I get both the benefits of a molecular exchange with the earth and nicer looking calf muscles.  I will take before and after photos and post them if there are, in fact, visible changes.

For now, I will say that my starting point measurements, as of 2012-04-04, are:

just under the kneecap: 31cm
widest point of calf:  36cm
10cm above the top of the ankle bone: 27.5cm
ankle bone: 22cm
Description of the back of the lower leg: non-descript.  No apparent muscle visuals even upon flexing.

Can I rehabilitate my fallen arches or are they too atrophied at this point and beyond repair? :queue mystery music here:

Friday, 30 March 2012

Paleo or Primal Pregnancy. What Can It Mean for Mother and Child?

My second pregnancy, I was borderline diabetic.  I was HUGE.   That is the child who was so ill.

I often wonder, if I had been primal, would he have been so severely ill?  I don't think so.  For too many reasons to list.

Even baby #3 reacts to gluten, though I was insanely gf.

Definition of insanely gf:  We don't allow it in the house and if guests bring it, we, as nicely as possible - because we know they are just trying to be thoughtful - ask them to put it back in their vehicle.

I was mostly primal (eating minimal grain, one serving or less per day) with him (#3) ... but he does not react to gluten or for that matter, to grains in general, to the same degree.  So I don't buy the whole "you have to consume gluten to trigger the reaction gene into activity" line.  Because he never had it, even in utero but he still reacts to it.

I'm somewhat angry about the 2nd pregnancy.  As soon as they saw there was a risk, why was there no one to say to me, "Cut out grains altogether. It's better for the baby and you don't need them.  They're just spiking your sugar, which is not good for either of you."

Instead, I was left wondering if I should reduce my food intake because my weight gain was so much more than it should have been.  (I'll try not to get started on the whole CR (calorie reduction) ridiculousness today.  I'll save it for another day to write about... again.)  I did not.  I could not.  I like food WAY too much and get WAY too hungry, especially if I'm pregnant or breastfeeding a baby. But if someone had told me that I could eat as much as I felt I needed to be comfortable if I just cut out grain and sugar, I would have done it in a heartbeat.  Partly for the baby and partly because I felt HORRIBLE.

My 3rd pregnancy (paleo/primal), I ate all I wanted (as I have always done), was never hungry and gained only 30lbs (as opposed to 50 for the others).  I lost it all within days of have the baby by beginning a pseudo  fast the minute I went into labour. (soup broth, tea and only the odd rice biscuit with cheese and maybe some honey).  And no, my milk production did not differ.  I still made quite enough milk.  The baby grew well and I nursed him until the age of five, as I did the others.   (I know extended breastfeeding freaks some people out.  Don't send me notes as I won't validate criticism from people who clearly have no idea re: the many benefits of extended breastfeeding.)

I kid you not.  That 3rd pg was rockin!  I felt like Wonder Woman.

And though now my kids are all healthy and our whole family has been doctor free for the last ten years, child #3 is the one who has never had health issues and has the best skin colour (year long - not just in the summer) of the three.  I wonder about this all the time.  His biggest reactor was cheese, which I was eating copious amounts of all the time.  And as he gets older, he reacts much less, which is interesting on it's own level.

It's not medical peoples' faults though.  Their training is what it is.  They are trained in treatment, not prevention. And that's important to remember.  The problem is when they act like they know there is no prevention when they have not been trained in that area.   It leads people to thinking prevention does not exist when it does.

After 10 years of doing this, I know that most medical professionals have no idea about this particular disease prevention/coping technique.  Although recently I have happily hooked up with a couple of paleo/primal doctors (finally!) but only on a social level as they are too far away. -.-            

Not that we've used doctors for the last ten years.  But I would like to get someone to run the blood tests I want done.  The last time I brought S in (it had been 5 years since his last bt) they wouldn't do it because he 'looked to healthy'.  I wanted to know where is creatinine, ferritin and eosinophil levels were as they are historically always off... which helps me to think about the next direction to go with him.  If those levels ever get truly straightened out, I will be able to stop doing a whole lot of brain gymnastics and move on to another subject... say... rocket science. ;D

Here is a link to my currently favourite video about the science behind a paleo/primal lifestyle:
The Best Explanation Ever Re: Gluten and Grain

Wednesday, 28 March 2012

Paleo Kids

People ask if I homeschool my kids to keep them away from the SAD.
Yes I do.

Last year, due to work circumstances, we sent them to school for the first time (ages 5, 11 and 13).

A child once told me a teacher called candy "brain food". I'm sure she was a great academic teacher...  But as with most of the general public, she really had no idea how damaging all this garbage is for humans.

One of our experiences was during standardized testing, all the kids were given sugar filled muffins to eat. When my son asked to go to his locker to get some of his own food, he was denied. (Yes, that resulted in a letter to the principal the minute he got home from school.)

Candy was passed out almost daily, pizza days usurped our family treats (because of just because they get treats at school we couldn't then double up on them at home).  So movie nights were sans movie night treats.  In fact, family time became devoid of treats because they were getting so much at school.

I realize that people think I am extreme when it comes to food. I don't mind. Really.  I have both gained and lost friends over it and have no remorse.  I do not apologize for changing my life and my children's lives for the better.

Let me start with our mistaken beginning.  My middle child was very ill for 3 years.  No physician, specialist, naturopath, homeopath or chiropractor could heal him.  Finally, after his pediatrician kept insisting it was food (particularly gluten - no specialist would back her suspicions), I created a total elimination diet so that she would 'move on' and start looking for what was 'really' his underlying health issue.

Well, the change was almost over-night.  I went into detail on my Aria Life website so I won't here.  Needless to say I was amazed and thrilled with his recovery.  No more middle-of-the-night hospital visits!

And since it's unfair to subject a child to that process all alone, we did the elimination diet as a family unit.  I suppose, at this point, I should tell you a little about me:

In highschool, I was always one of the smallest kids in the school.  I distinctly remember family members joking around about the fact that I was old enough to graduate highschool but still hadn't hit three digit weight numbers.  I was 88 pounds at the time.  I ate every meal and all foods I could get my hands on and had no food issues other than I loved it all, except for vegetables.  I could wolf down 2 Big Macs, 2 large fries and a chocolate shake shocking my two uncles who were young adults, since I  kept up with them in appetite and ability to pack away food.

We all put it down to the fairly extensive swimming I did.  Over an hour a day for speed or synchro and at least another hour for diving.  I placed 1st in my city, Windsor for 50 fly and the medley team I was honoured to find a position on as flyer, placed 3rd in Ontario. I suffered terrible migraines throughout, most often attending swim meets with an inability to turn my head from one side to the other.  We were always instructed to eat a big bowl of spaghetti the night before a swim meet and I was happy to comply. My only other complaint was one bum knee.  In other words, I seemed, fit, healthy and raring to go.  In emergency, for the headaches/migraines, they would give me Tylenol 4s.  The result of this was an addiction to codeine by the age of 18.  In my 20s, I overcame that by implementing chiropractic visits.  So I slid through my 20s in fairly good condition as long as I steadily attended my chiropractic adjustments to control my headaches.

Then I had my first successful pregnancy, and by age 35, I was overweight with bad joints, adult onset asthma (2 different puffers, neither of which did much good but I'd puff on them anyway), heart palpitations, severe fatigue (Dr. tested me 3 years in a row for lupus. He was convinced I had it.), migraines, headaches, mouth ulcers, and more.  To look at me though, people generally thought I was the picture of health.  They had no idea the suffering that was taking place outside of the public realm.

Those rolls are not the dress. Sigh.
This is not even the worst point.
Funny thing was, I felt I had no room to complain.  I was still healthier than my counter parts who were also dealing with high blood pressure and diabetes II (though at my heaviest I was pre-diabetic). Still, I kept telling myself that this was unacceptable! I had to do something to change what happened to me! I did not want my kids to have this kind of body at the age of 35!  But I had no idea what to do.  And frankly, everyone around me didn't seem to be faring any better.  Could this be normal?  How depressing.

I had bought into the whole grain pop-culture with a fervor and paid the price that many are paying today. After reading in the Fanny Farmer cookbook that wholewheat bread was the most complete food on the planet with only the addition of butter, I made loaf after loaf  along with a tireless parade of homemade, wholewheat products.  We also consumed vast quantities of dairy...

I practiced home canning with all it's sugars, telling myself the whole time that this was healthier than what I could buy in the stores.  And we did not really track our junk food because we figured the 'good food' made up for it.

And yes, I hate to admit it but even now, I cannot be around cheese. I am a notable cheese junky.  It is much akin to an ex-smoker being around smokers. I can't do it. So I seldom go to food events unless I know I can stick to my tea.

When we did that elimination diet (Ten years ago now!) the answer to all of my maladies was also discovered.  Even though I focused on healing my son, going through the process with him meant that I also began to heal myself. I couldn't believe the difference (especially in my sick kid)! But I was just as surprised at how much better my life got.  Even though I was eating high fat, high calorie foods (eggs with yolks, many nuts, avocado, loads of meat), I was steadily losing weight.


One year with my new food lifestyle.  No more double chin!
No muscle either, as I had not yet realized how much better
things could get with some muscle.  110 lbs maybe.
Now I must tell you that I have never been a calorie counter.  I never believed in it.  Even when I was big, I thought I got big because I was pregnant and/or nursing and so perhaps required the extra fat storage.  By the time I got to my third pregnancy, I knew this all to be untrue. However, from 1997-2002, while I was big, I though maybe I was supposed to be that way.

And so when I began this no grain/starch lifestyle (SCD - Specific Carbohydrate Diet) after our elimination diet, I ate until I was full, as I had done for my entire life.

What else happened besides losing the weight? No more heart palpitations. Gone, was the asthma. Fatigue, migraines, headaches, joint pain, you name it, it was all history. And so then I started to move. I became stronger, faster, had more endurance.

And I *loved* it. I mean REALLY *LOVED* it.
Just before my broken nose.  About 130 lbs.

I am 45 now and have been medication free/doctor free for ten years. Well, except for that year that I got my nose busted in a self-defense competition (age 43). Consequently, I won gold in all three categories that year (pattern, self-defense and of course, sparring). I don't say this to be boastful. I say this to inspire. Because if I can do it, anyone can do it.

At this point, I'm 120 lbs (89 of which is muscle) and working on getting more muscle. (I lost about 9 lbs of muscle during February doing a cardio challenge.  I burned off over 18,000 calories according to my Polar, even forgetting to wear it a few times. Do not do hours and hours of cardio.  Just take my word for it.)  Nevertheless, I feel better than I did in my twenties (when I was last this weight).

is what I want for my kids.  Well, not the broken nose part.

But I digress...

So I sent them to school for the first time last year due to work circumstances, where things like muffins (cake) and candy were handed out regularly. And where they would have to sit watching kids eat sandwiches and cookies. That is not easy for an ADULT to do.

As the year progressed, I began feeding them more and more grain (albeit insanely gluten free) to help 'equate' their food to the rest of the children thereby helping them to feel 'normal'.  This resulted in them becoming more difficult with regards to their behaviour and their sleep patterns became more erratic.  They were consuming more sugar and grain than ever before due to the pressures of being 'normal' at school... and even still, they ate far less of this garbage than the other children. Even worse, my not-sick-anymore-kid (12 yr old) was getting sicker and sicker (virals) again.

Ground beef in vegetable sauce and salad.
(celery, pickled pepperoncini peppers, purple onion)
Wrapped in Romaine leaves.
Last September, when given the choice to go back to school or homeschool, the 12-year-old had no reservations. Homeschooling was his first choice.  He didn't even have to think about it. The 6-year-old went back for about a month before he had had enough of that.

"What do mean I have to go every day???" -.-

And as I write this out, they sit beside me learning the muscles and bones of the body whilst chewing on their apples, after eating hot tomato meat sauce over vegetables for lunch.

Their health has improved. Their attitude has improved. Their behaviour has improved. Their bone growth has improved. Their sleep has improved... and more, so much more.  Most important of all, my not-sick-anymore-kid is once again my not-sick-anymore-kid.

Some say it was the school environment and the 'cool' factor.  To a degree, perhaps.  But the total accumulation of all these issues was not the school environment completely. When they first got home, I had to re-wean them off the daily junk food they were getting at school. Gradually, we noticed a HUGE difference, especially regarding behaviour.  And the closer to what I now know to be called paleo/primal we got, the more things improved... again.

Holding position.
Of course, he has to do
whatever big brother does.

And having them show off their
skills are one of the other many
joys of homeschooling.
Our 6-year-old was on his way to becoming a real hitter. It didn't matter how much I explained what he should do if he was unhappy with a situation, he would still just lash out. Well, eventually, I got rid of the treats through the week. And then finally, all grain through the week was eliminated.

Now, on Friday nights, corn tacos with meat in a vegetable paste base is considered a real treat. And Sunday afternoons, a bowl of junk food cereal is considered a getting-away-with-murder treat. ;D

Speaking of cereal. In our house it is NOT for breakfast, like conventional society would have us believe is fine, and even healthy.  In our home, MEAT and/or eggs with some fruit or veggies are breakfast.  If a person does not feel like 'big' food, then vegetable/fruit smoothies are an option.  Healthy food goes in FIRST, in order to qualify for the snack treat. NOT something that severely skews blood sugar.

He is holding this position,
Not spinning through it.
12 year olds don't do
strength training
at school recess.
It's not cool.

What happened? No more hitting happened. Magically. The very week I got rid of all the grain.

You can't fight with those results.

Often, I hear parents say, "But they won't eat the good stuff." (vegetables)

My response to that is, "Just put five real foods in front of them and let them choose."

That way, if they're sensitive to something (and therefore have an aversion to it), they have other options open to them.

We have an open fridge policy and the one who is my pickiest (used to be my sick child) can choose any two or three other veggies for dinner if he doesn't like what I've provided.  Interesting thing though, the more strict we are with paleo, the more veggies he eats willingly. He hardly makes his own anymore.

Hmm. Could it possibly be a good thing for a kid to eat more veggies? ;)

Monday, 19 March 2012

Eating By The Earth

We don't have to kill our own food today to practice the paleo food lifestyle BUT many people do not comprehend what 'living off the land' really looks like until you ask them to 'find your food' rather than shop for it.

Part of a paleo/primal diet is about being more aware of the earth around us and what it has to offer.

What would you eat if there were no grocery store? Go outside. Why not? The weather's nice enough. Look around. What do you see that is edible? What is the most abundant and easy to collect?

Does access change seasonally? Regionally? What would you have to do if you had no access to grocery stores for a year?

Would we eat seeds or would it be more prudent to leave the seeds to make more plants as plants have many leaves and many leaves will fill more stomachs than a few seeds?

Would we consume the milk of an animal or let the animal's offspring drink the milk so that we would have the grown off-spring to make stew with through the winter?

There are many more similar questions that I constantly have floating around me.

I never seem to get tired of considering them. :)

Here is a pretty cool write-up done by students, reviewing current beliefs about the evolution of diet practices: Prehistoric Life

Of what current tribal hunting/gathering practices yield: Early Ancestors

And a very cool article about how science is changing ideas about what has been eaten in the past based on dental etchings: Rethinking Food Intake of the Caveman

I like to imagine what I might think if there were no grocery stores.

When I think about it, I always begin with spring.  At that time, the easiest thing to get is greens (in warm weather months), later in the season, fruit and birds.  (Killing two birds with one stone so-to-speak lol).  Collecting and drying this type of food for winter use would be a very big deal because of such a lack of plant life, especially in areas that maintain snow through the winter.

There might be one big hunt at the beginning of the year to celebrate the coming of the warm months, resulting in one big meal of meat and fresh greens.  After that, a fair bit might be turned into soup/stew.   And lastly, the remainder would be salted and turned into dried meat.  This meat would be used later in the summer to make more soup.  And hopefully there would be enough left over to put away for some winter months also.

Another hunt might occur in the fall, after all the wild babies had weaned from their mothers resulting in an end-of-season feast with the rest being dried and put away for winter.

In cold weather months some hunting might occur for another large portion of meat.  And during very long winters it might be considered lucky to find a larger animal who has died of starvation and frozen.

All the skins through the year would be saved and turned into clothing during the many winter months of sitting and saving energy.

I spoke to a  person on a primal site the other day where there was an argument going on over whether women are supposed to have visible abs or not.  (How ridiculous is that?  If you want them fine.  If you don't want them, fine.  Can we all just support eachother in our individual goals toward health?)

When I think about this seasonal eating, it makes sense that we have evolved into beings that prefer to cycle on and off different foods depending upon what is seasonally available. So this also should be considered in a 'paleo' diet. It makes sense on many levels and in many practices including the health results that many people experience with various types of fasting practises, rotational religious practises (lent, fish on Fridays, etc.) and various other historical practices that rotate food and end up creating (intentionally or unintentionally) a detox process that aids in healing a greater portion of the population. This leads to wondering about the current gluten/dairy fasting regimen (which may be sporadic for some or last for years/lifetime for others) that is quickly gaining popularity may be just another one of these modern day practices (rather than being based on season or religion, is based on pop-culture) that may spare the portion of the population that participates, from health issues experienced by the non-participating group. It would all be very interesting, after many years have passed, to see how this gf/cf/paleo 'craze' of the early 20th century will be interpreted.

Thursday, 9 February 2012

Selenium/Thyroid Information Tree

SELENIUM Information Tree

Low levels may contribute to:  thyroid disease
                                              heart disease
                                              immune function
                                              male infertility
                                              RA (rheumatoid arthritis)-
                                                         supplements at this point in time are not believed to cure RA, only that low Se is noted in the disorder.

  Thyroid:  located in neck
                 one of the largest endocrine glands
                 controls energy use
                 controls sensitivity to other hormones
                  regulates rate of metabolism
                  produces PTH (parathyroid hormone)
                            peaks approx. 8 hours after calcium ingestion
                            controls vitD conversion in kidneys
                  produces calcitonin re: calcium homeostasis (metabolism)
                  requires iodine
                  required tyrosine

                  result potential of thyroid inefficiency:
                             cardiac disease
                             reproductive issues

                 increasing thyroid function/hormones:
                                  "70% of maximum heart rate...caused the most prominent changes in the amount of any                
                                               hormone values"
                                           "the rate of T4, fT4, and TSH continued to rise at 90% of maximum heart rate, the rate 
                                             of T3 and fT3 started to fall"
                                   seaweed (iodine may help increase low hormone levels or aggravate high levels)
     Calcium homeostasis (metabolism)
                   human body contains approx. 1kg of calcium

                    reduces blood calcium
                    stimulated by increase in serum calcium
                    inhibits osteoclast activity in bones

                      cell that removes bone tissue
                      controls amount of bone tissue
 Selenium Food Sources: (often dependent on soil selenium levels)
                       sunflower seeds
                       brazil nuts
                       brewer's yeast,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=896609a829c84a47&ion=1&biw=1600&bih=787&ion=1&pf=p&pdl=500

Information Tree - Introduction

Information Tree Introduction

People often ask me how I know of the things that I try to apply to everyday life.

I couldn't really explain it over tea.   I suppose because most of it is based on long arguments about the whys and whatnots.

A long and winding road is what it has been for me these last ten (already!) years for me.  And since food/digestive sciences/studies are constantly changing, I often feel the need to revisit topics to see if science has changed its mind... and I can, right now, affirm with every molecule of my being... that indeed they do change their minds quite frequently.  What is very interesting is that often, the bottom line remains the same but the details change, sometimes quite startlingly.

When dealing with malabsorption disorders, it's often the details that make or break  the efficacy of a treatment... especially with regards to food preparation.  One example is bone broth soup.  Years ago, science said for a dairy free diet, adequate calcium levels could be maintained with bone broth soup.  They still say that.  They used to say that bones needed to be simmered for three to four hours with an acid source.  Now science says twenty four hours.  Yes indeed, it is possible that this time change could make or break... bones. So occasional review is important.

Not long ago, someone saw one of my charts... the beginning form that most of my research takes as I jump around from one idea to another.  She expressed an interest in, not only reading my final piece but in seeing the initial 'information trees' that I create... as they often contain information that doesn't make it into the final piece.

For those who enjoy charts and trees and such, please be welcome to consume them to your hearts' content.